|
New Traditions Compendium Forums & Commentaries: 1992-96 |
HOLLY HILL
(1992)
In London, during the summer of 1989, my
British colleagues advised me that the "must see" production was
Declan Donnellan's staging of Fuente Ovejuna at the National Theatre. My
esteem equaled theirs, as I told an American colleague also visiting London.
"Terrible, terrible," he disagreed. "When Queen Isabella came on
played by a black actress, the production lost all credibility. Isabella
couldn't have been black." My colleague wasn't as bothered that the young
romantic and comic leads in the British Fuente Ovejuna were also played
by black actors — Moors might have inter-married with peasants during the
Moorish occupation of Spain — but it was unthinkable that a Spanish Queen could
be black.
I was stupefied that one actress' color
would spoil a magnificent production for anyone and my colleague's comments
haunted me as I began to consider their implications. Had I once had
reservations about non-traditional casting? All I recall is being introduced to
it at the New York Shakespeare Festival and LaMama in the Sixties, and
realizing somewhere along the way that non-traditional casting was a new
theatrical convention for which I could suspend disbelief as I did for so many
others.
It isn't that I didn't, and don't,
notice that Hamlet is wearing a turtleneck, that Theseus and the Athenians are
speaking English and Oberon and the fairies are speaking Chinese, that Harpagon
is on roller skates, or that Queen Isabella is black. I notice, and my usual
response is "Oh? Okay." The "okay" may sometimes be
half-hearted, and will be rescinded if I feel that the performer or production
is terrible, but I think the chance is worth taking. In fact, I have come to
look forward to the excitement and illumination that non-traditional casting
can bring.
The contretemps with my colleague over Fuente
Ovejuna jolted me into contemplating how fortunate I was to be able to
embrace non-traditional casting, into wondering how wide a diversity of opinion
existed among critics, and into wanting to create a forum for critics to share
our views with each other, with members of the theater community, and with our
readers. The result was the Subcommittee for Cultural Diversity of the American
Theatre Critics Association, founded in the summer of 1990, just a month before
the Miss Saigon controversy brought the issue of non-traditional casting
to international attention.
The American Theatre Critics Association
began in 1974 at the O'Neill Theater Center and is the only national
association of theater critics in the U.S., with some 250 members working in
both print and broadcast media. ATCA holds two national gatherings yearly, a
winter weekend mini-meeting in New York and a spring/summer conference in a
regional setting. In addition to marathon play-going at these gatherings,
numerous panels, guest speakers, and ATCA committee work are aimed at helping
us become more enlightened and enlivened critics.
The Subcommittee on Cultural Diversity,
or the CD's (as I call us), work to inform our members and the communities
which we address on issues of multiculturalism in the theater. Our first major
activity was a panel at the 1991 New York mini-meeting — "Miss Saigon
and After: Non-Traditional Casting." Panelists were Benny Sato Ambush
(Associate Artistic Director, American Conservatory Theater in San Francisco),
Dennis deLeon (Chair, New York City Human Rights Commission), Bernard Jacobs
(President, Shubert Organization), Mary Lee (Resident Ensemble Member, Pan
Asian Repertory and founding member of APACE), and Abel Lopez (Associate
Producing Director, GALA Hispanic Theatre, Washington, D.C.), and their
discussion was lively indeed. The CD's also arranged for representatives of the
Non-Traditional Casting Project to give a seminar to the Fellows of the
National Critics Institute at the O'Neill Theater Center in the summer of 1991,
and that was so successful that the NTCP has been asked to do a presentation
every year.
Many ATCA members wrote or broadcast
information about the panel and/or the NCI presentations, and these first
responses reflected a range of ideas and feelings as broad as that over Fuente
Ovejuna. Most important to those of us who had already embraced
non-traditional casting on stage, backstage, and in theater management is that
some members who had not thought or at least not written much about it before
are now doing so. And independent of the CD's, members are organizing
multicultural activities: at our Chicago meeting last spring, conference
organizer Jonathan Abarbanel scheduled a panel of physically-challenged actors
and artists of color at an African American cultural center.
ATCA is an almost exclusively white
organization, though not by design. Crucial to the Cultural Diversity
Subcommittee's mission is identifying and recruiting critics of color.
We have sent correspondence to
organizations of journalists of color, and attempted some personal contacts.
Our success in these initial attempts has been varied. On the down side, for
example, the Artistic Director of an African American theater told an ATCA
representative that she knew many African American critics but would not give
him their names or encourage them to join us, because she thought that they
would be corrupted by associating with us. On the up side, among the Critics
Fellows at the O'Neill last summer, was Sandra Dillard-Rosen, a founder of the
National Association of Black Journalists. The newly appointed theater critic
of the Denver Post, Sandra has joined ATCA and at our national meeting in
Cleveland this May she will become co-chair of the Subcommittee on Cultural
Diversity.
The immediate future challenges us to
find more ways of enlightening our members about multiculturalism and to make
our membership culturally diverse. The immediate past makes me hopeful. When I
joined ATCA in 1979, there were few women theater critics in major positions
either in New York or across the U.S. Today, women are more widely represented
in theater criticism and this development is reflected in the membership. My
hope is that what has happened with women will happen with critics of color.
The ultimate goal of the CD's is to become obsolete some time in the future
when what is now called non-traditional casting and minority hiring has become
the norm rather than an exception in a truly integrated theater and society.